Could dumping iron in the oceans slow global warming?
Using iron fertilizer to create algae blooms could help our oceans absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, say researchers.
By Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer / July 18, 2012
This species of diatom, Corethron pennatum, bloomed during the iron fertilization.
Marina Montresor, SZN / Alfred Wegener Institute
Some hope fertilizing tiny, floating plants in the ocean, prompting them to suck carbon dioxide out of the air, could help solve global warming.
-
Gallery: Rising seas
| Ads by Google |
|
See To the Arctic in IMAX® now at
the Museum of Science. Buy tickets! |
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition
A new experiment confirms this controversial idea has some merit, although important questions remain.
Using an eddy in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica, researchers used iron fertilizer — the sort used to improve lawns — to create a man-made algal bloom. In the weeks that followed, researchers say, this bloom funneled a significant amount of Earth-warming carbon down into the ocean’s depths, where it will remain sequestered for some time, unable to contribute to global warming.
This experiment provides some important insight into this potential approach to combating climate change, said Ken Buesseler, of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, writing in Thursday’s (July 19) issue of thejournal Nature.
A potential solution?
This general approach, modifying the planet to address climate change, is known as geoengineering, and, geoengineering proposals like iron fertilization tend to raise many uncertainties and risks. Other geoengineering ideas have included pumping aerosols into the atmosphere to block out solar radiation or tucking away excess carbon in underground reservoirs. [Top 10 Craziest Environmental Ideas]
Ocean fertilization is a controversial idea, prompting protest from those who fear the unintended environmental impacts it may have.
“Most scientists would agree that we are nowhere near the point of recommending [iron fertilization of the oceans] as a geoengineering tool. But many think that larger and longer [iron fertilization] experiments should be performed to help us to decide which, if any, of the many geoengineering options at hand should be deployed,” Buesseler wrote.
Phytoplankton, which includes microscopic marine plants and photosynthetic microbes, blooms naturally in the ocean. However, in seawater, there is only limited iron, an element these organisms need to grow, so by adding iron to seawater, it’s possible to make a man-made bloom.
In this study, the researchers fertilized an eddy because it offered a largely self-contained system, or “a gigantic test tube,” said lead researcher Victor Smetacek, with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Potsdam, Germany.
By mixing an iron fertilizer into the seawater, the researchers created the equivalent of a good-size spring bloom like those seen in the North Sea or off Georges Bank off the New Englandcoast, which turned the water from blue to turquoise, Smetacek said.
Moving carbon
The team found that after they added the iron, the levels of nutrients, including nitrogen, phosphorus and silicic acid, which algae called diatoms use to construct their glass shells, declined until around 24 days after the fertilizer was added.
Dissolved inorganic carbon, which normally remains in equilibrium with the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, also declined more quickly than it could be replaced by the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Meanwhile, their measurements revealed particulate organic matter, including the silica the diatoms used to make their shells, and chlorophyll, the green pigment used in photosynthesis, increased within the surface waters.
Wow, now dumping huge quantities of iron sulphite into the ocean is considered environmentally friendly? So I guess we’ll open up new iron mines to provide the iron necessary to save the planet. I suppose iron mining might be considered green jobs. Mountaintop removal is now green?
What has happened to my environmentl movement? This is the movement that I was a proud member of since about 1970.
Thank god I’m not an environmentalist anymore. I’m not wearing this one, modern greenies can wear it if they want. Good luck.
By: klem on July 20, 2012
at 3:11 pm
I agree that we have to be on the alert for unintended consequences, on the other hand I think more research should be done to see if it could be done without negative impacts. I’m not necessarily condoning the eventual project just saying we should proceed slowly and carefully with more research.
By: coastlinesproject on July 20, 2012
at 6:04 pm